Land Rover Defender 2002 vs Mitsubishi Pajero 2000
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Land Rover Defender is available only with manual gearbox, whereas Mitsubishi Pajero has both automatic and manual transmission options. | |||
| Engines: | 2.5 (diesel) | 2.5 - 3.5 (petrol, diesel) | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 122 HP | 100 - 202 HP | |
| Torque: | 300 NM | 240 - 373 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 17.5 seconds | 10 - 17.8 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 10.1 | 9.5 - 14.2 | |
|
On average, Land Rover Defender equipped with diesel engines consume 0.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mitsubishi Pajero. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.88 m | 4.28 m | |
| Width: | 1.79 m | 1.87 m | |
| Height: | 2.08 m | 1.84 m | |
|
Land Rover Defender is smaller, but higher. Land Rover Defender is 40 cm shorter than the Mitsubishi Pajero, 8 cm narrower, while the height of Land Rover Defender is 24 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 12.3 meters | 10.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Land Rover Defender is 1.7 metres more than that of the Mitsubishi Pajero, which means Land Rover Defender can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 3`500 | ~ 2`800 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | above average | |
| Average price (€): | no data | 3800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Land Rover Defender has
|
Mitsubishi Pajero has
| |