Land Rover Defender 2011 vs Toyota Land Cruiser 2007
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
Gearbox: | Manual | Manual/Automatic | |
---|---|---|---|
Land Rover Defender is available only with manual gearbox, whereas Toyota Land Cruiser has both automatic and manual transmission options. | |||
Engines: | 2.2 (diesel) | 4.0 - 5.7 (petrol, diesel) | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 122 HP | 235 - 381 HP | |
Torque: | 360 NM | 376 - 615 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 15.8 seconds | 8.6 - 9.2 seconds | |
Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 10.2 | 10.0 - 15.6 | |
On average, Land Rover Defender equipped with diesel engines consume 0.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Toyota Land Cruiser. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.04 m | 4.95 m | |
Width: | 1.79 m | 1.97 m | |
Height: | 2.18 m | 1.95 m | |
Land Rover Defender is smaller, but higher. Land Rover Defender is 91 cm shorter than the Toyota Land Cruiser, 18 cm narrower, while the height of Land Rover Defender is 23 cm higher. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 3904 litres | 701 litres | |
Land Rover Defender has more luggage capacity. Even though the car is shorter, Land Rover Defender has 3203 litres more trunk space than the Toyota Land Cruiser. The Toyota Land Cruiser may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. | |||
Turning diameter: | 12.3 meters | 12 meters | |
The turning circle of the Land Rover Defender is 0.3 metres more than that of the Toyota Land Cruiser. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | ~ 2`550 | ~ 3`300 | |
Safety: | no data | no data | |
Quality: | no data | no data | |
Average price (€): | no data | 20 800 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Land Rover Defender has
|
Toyota Land Cruiser has
| |