Land Rover Defender 1991 vs Mitsubishi Pajero 1991
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Land Rover Defender is available only with manual gearbox, whereas Mitsubishi Pajero has both automatic and manual transmission options. | |||
| Engines: | 2.5 - 3.5 | 2.4 - 3.5 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 86 - 136 HP | 99 - 245 HP | |
| Torque: | 203 - 300 NM | 211 - 343 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 14.7 - 24 seconds | 10 - 25.1 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 10.1 - 18.1 | 11.0 - 14.5 | |
|
Land Rover Defender petrol engines consumes on average 4.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than Mitsubishi Pajero. On average, Land Rover Defender equipped with diesel engines consume 0.9 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mitsubishi Pajero. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.60 m | 4.71 m | |
| Width: | 1.79 m | 1.75 m | |
| Height: | 2.05 m | 1.88 m | |
| Land Rover Defender is 11 cm shorter than the Mitsubishi Pajero, 4 cm wider, while the height of Land Rover Defender is 17 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 1350 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 2600 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 12.8 meters | 11.8 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Land Rover Defender is 1 metres more than that of the Mitsubishi Pajero, which means Land Rover Defender can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 3`500 | ~ 3`073 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | above average | |
| Average price (€): | 7200 | 3600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Land Rover Defender has
|
Mitsubishi Pajero has
| |