Land Rover Defender 1991 vs Toyota Land Cruiser 1990
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Land Rover Defender is available only with manual gearbox, whereas Toyota Land Cruiser has both automatic and manual transmission options. | |||
| Engines: | 2.5 - 3.5 | 2.8 - 4.5 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 86 - 136 HP | 91 - 215 HP | |
| Torque: | 203 - 300 NM | 188 - 380 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 14.7 - 24 seconds | 11.4 - 16 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 10.1 - 18.1 | 11.2 - 17.8 | |
|
Land Rover Defender petrol engines consumes on average 2.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than Toyota Land Cruiser. On average, Land Rover Defender equipped with diesel engines consume 1.8 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Toyota Land Cruiser. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.60 m | 4.84 m | |
| Width: | 1.79 m | 1.89 m | |
| Height: | 2.05 m | 1.91 m | |
|
Land Rover Defender is smaller, but higher. Land Rover Defender is 24 cm shorter than the Toyota Land Cruiser, 10 cm narrower, while the height of Land Rover Defender is 14 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 832 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1370 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 12.8 meters | 12 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Land Rover Defender is 0.8 metres more than that of the Toyota Land Cruiser, which means Land Rover Defender can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 3`500 | ~ 2`993 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 7200 | 11 800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Land Rover Defender has
|
Toyota Land Cruiser has
| |