Land Rover Defender 1991 vs Land Rover Defender 1996
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 2.5 - 3.5 | 2.5 - 3.9 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 86 - 136 HP | 113 - 182 HP | |
| Torque: | 203 - 300 NM | 265 - 314 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 14.7 - 24 seconds | 17.5 - 18.6 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 10.1 - 18.1 | 9.8 - 10.1 | |
|
On average, Land Rover Defender 1991 equipped with diesel engines consume 0.8 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Land Rover Defender 1996. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.60 m | 3.88 m | |
| Width: | 1.79 m | 1.79 m | |
| Height: | 2.05 m | 2.01 m | |
| Land Rover Defender 1991 is 72 cm longer than the Land Rover Defender 1996, width is practically the same , while the height of Land Rover Defender 1991 is 4 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 12.8 meters | 11.7 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Land Rover Defender 1991 is 1.1 metres more than that of the Land Rover Defender 1996, which means Land Rover Defender 1991 can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 3`500 | ~ 3`500 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 7200 | 11 000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Land Rover Defender has
|
Land Rover Defender has
| |