Land Rover Defender 2002 vs Honda CR-V 2004
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Land Rover Defender is available only with manual gearbox, whereas Honda CR-V has both automatic and manual transmission options. | |||
| Engines: | 2.5 (diesel) | 2.0 - 2.4 (petrol, diesel) | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 122 HP | 140 - 162 HP | |
| Torque: | 300 NM | 190 - 340 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 17.5 seconds | 10.6 - 12 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 10.8 | 6.7 - 10.1 | |
|
On average, Land Rover Defender equipped with diesel engines consume 4.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Honda CR-V. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.60 m | 4.61 m | |
| Width: | 1.79 m | 1.78 m | |
| Height: | 2.08 m | 1.71 m | |
| Land Rover Defender is 1 cm shorter than the Honda CR-V, 1 cm wider, while the height of Land Rover Defender is 37 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 527 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 952 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 12.8 meters | 10.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Land Rover Defender is 2.2 metres more than that of the Honda CR-V, which means Land Rover Defender can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 3`500 | ~ 1`910 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | above average | |
| Average price (€): | 29 800 | 3200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Land Rover Defender has
|
Honda CR-V has
| |