Land Rover Defender 2002 vs Toyota 4-Runner 2003
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | Rear wheel drive (RWD) / All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
| Land Rover Defender is available only with four wheel (4x4) drive, while Toyota 4-Runner can be equipped with rear wheel drive and four wheel (4x4) drive. All-wheel drive models tend to consume more fuel, so if you don't need off road capabilities, Toyota 4-Runner also offers 2-wheel drive versions for fuel economy. 2WD versions also have lower maintenance costs. | |||
| Engines: | 2.5 | 4.0 - 4.7 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 122 HP | 235 - 245 HP | |
| Torque: | 300 NM | 382 - 434 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 17.5 seconds | 7.8 - 8 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 10.8 | 12.2 - 14.1 | |
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.60 m | 4.80 m | |
| Width: | 1.79 m | 1.88 m | |
| Height: | 2.08 m | 1.76 m | |
|
Land Rover Defender is smaller, but higher. Land Rover Defender is 20 cm shorter than the Toyota 4-Runner, 9 cm narrower, while the height of Land Rover Defender is 33 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 1195 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 2050 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 12.8 meters | 11.1 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Land Rover Defender is 1.7 metres more than that of the Toyota 4-Runner, which means Land Rover Defender can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 3`500 | ~ 2`411 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 24 000 | no data | |
| Pros and Cons: |
|
Toyota 4-Runner has
| |