Land Rover Defender 2002 vs Nissan Pathfinder 2005
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Land Rover Defender is available only with manual gearbox, whereas Nissan Pathfinder has both automatic and manual transmission options. | |||
| Engines: | 2.5 (diesel) | 2.5 - 4.0 (petrol, diesel) | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 122 HP | 174 - 269 HP | |
| Torque: | 300 NM | 385 - 403 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 17.5 seconds | 8.9 - 12.3 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 10.8 | 9.0 - 13.5 | |
|
On average, Land Rover Defender equipped with diesel engines consume 1.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Nissan Pathfinder. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.60 m | 4.74 m | |
| Width: | 1.79 m | 1.85 m | |
| Height: | 2.08 m | 1.78 m | |
|
Land Rover Defender is smaller, but higher. Land Rover Defender is 14 cm shorter than the Nissan Pathfinder, 6 cm narrower, while the height of Land Rover Defender is 30 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 515 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 2091 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 12.8 meters | 12.4 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Land Rover Defender is 0.4 metres more than that of the Nissan Pathfinder, which means Land Rover Defender can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 3`500 | ~ 2`822 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 29 200 | 6400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Land Rover Defender has
|
Nissan Pathfinder has
| |