Land Rover Defender 2007 vs Jeep Cherokee 2005
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
Gearbox: | Manual | Manual/Automatic | |
---|---|---|---|
Land Rover Defender is available only with manual gearbox, whereas Jeep Cherokee has both automatic and manual transmission options. | |||
Engines: | 2.4 (diesel) | 2.4 - 3.7 (petrol, diesel) | |
Both cars are available with diesel engines. Jeep Cherokee is available also with petrol engines. Petrol engines typically offer smoother operation and quicker acceleration compared to other engine types. | |||
Performance | |||
Power: | 122 HP | 147 - 211 HP | |
Torque: | 360 NM | 224 - 400 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | 10.8 - 13.9 seconds | |
Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 11.0 | 9.9 - 14.6 | |
On average, Land Rover Defender equipped with diesel engines consume 1.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Jeep Cherokee. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.64 m | 4.50 m | |
Width: | 1.79 m | 1.82 m | |
Height: | 2.03 m | 1.82 m | |
Land Rover Defender is 14 cm longer than the Jeep Cherokee, 3 cm narrower, while the height of Land Rover Defender is 21 cm higher. | |||
Trunk capacity: | no data | no data | |
Turning diameter: | 12.8 meters | 10.9 meters | |
The turning circle of the Land Rover Defender is 1.9 metres more than that of the Jeep Cherokee, which means Land Rover Defender can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | ~ 3`500 | ~ 2`784 | |
Safety: | no data | no data | |
Quality: | no data | no data | |
Average price (€): | 26 000 | 3600 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Land Rover Defender has
|
Jeep Cherokee has
| |