Land Rover Defender 2011 vs Toyota Land Cruiser 2012
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Land Rover Defender is available with both manual and automatic gearboxes, whereas Toyota Land Cruiser is available only with automatic gearbox. | |||
| Engines: | 2.2 (diesel) | 4.5 - 5.7 (petrol, diesel) | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 122 HP | 272 - 381 HP | |
| Torque: | 360 - 361 NM | 460 - 650 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 14.7 seconds | 8.6 - 8.9 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 11.1 | 9.5 - 15.0 | |
|
On average, Land Rover Defender equipped with diesel engines consume 1.6 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Toyota Land Cruiser. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.79 m | 4.95 m | |
| Width: | 2.02 m | 1.97 m | |
| Height: | 1.79 m | 1.87 m | |
| Land Rover Defender is 17 cm shorter than the Toyota Land Cruiser, 5 cm wider, while the height of Land Rover Defender is 7 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 4310 litres | 456 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 2313 litres | |
|
Land Rover Defender has more luggage capacity. Even though the car is shorter, Land Rover Defender has 3854 litres more trunk space than the Toyota Land Cruiser. The Toyota Land Cruiser may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. | |||
| Turning diameter: | no data | 11.8 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | no data | ~ 3`333 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | no data | 31 400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Land Rover Defender has
|
Toyota Land Cruiser has
| |