Land Rover Defender 2011 vs Nissan Pathfinder 2010
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 2.2 | 2.5 - 3.0 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 122 HP | 190 - 231 HP | |
| Torque: | 360 - 361 NM | 450 - 550 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 14.7 seconds | 8.9 - 11 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 11.1 | 8.7 - 9.5 | |
|
On average, Land Rover Defender equipped with diesel engines consume 2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Nissan Pathfinder. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.79 m | 4.81 m | |
| Width: | 2.02 m | 1.85 m | |
| Height: | 1.79 m | 1.78 m | |
| Land Rover Defender is 3 cm shorter than the Nissan Pathfinder, 17 cm wider, while the height of Land Rover Defender is 1 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 4310 litres | 515 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 2091 litres | |
|
Land Rover Defender has more luggage capacity. Even though the car is shorter, Land Rover Defender has 3795 litres more trunk space than the Nissan Pathfinder. The Nissan Pathfinder may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. | |||
| Turning diameter: | no data | 11.9 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | no data | ~ 2`913 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | no data | 9200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Land Rover Defender has
|
Nissan Pathfinder has
| |