Land Rover Defender 2019 vs Nissan Terrano 2013
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Land Rover Defender is available only with automatic gearbox, whereas Nissan Terrano has both automatic and manual transmission options. | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | Front wheel drive (FWD) / All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
| Land Rover Defender is available only with four wheel (4x4) drive, while Nissan Terrano can be equipped with front wheel drive and four wheel (4x4) drive. All-wheel drive models tend to consume more fuel, so if you don't need off road capabilities, Nissan Terrano also offers 2-wheel drive versions for fuel economy. 2WD versions also have lower maintenance costs. | |||
| Engines: | 2.0 - 5.0 | 1.5 - 2.0 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 200 - 525 HP | 85 - 143 HP | |
| Torque: | 400 - 650 NM | 156 - 248 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 5.2 - 10.2 seconds | 10.4 - 13.5 seconds | |
| In general, Land Rover Defender are available with more powerful and dynamic engines than Nissan Terrano. Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.6 - 14.5 | 4.9 - 8.3 | |
|
Land Rover Defender petrol engines consumes on average 4.4 litres more fuel per 100 km than Nissan Terrano. On average, Land Rover Defender equipped with diesel engines consume 2.9 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Nissan Terrano. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
| Ground clearance: | 226 - 295 mm (8.9 - 11.6 inches) | 205 mm (8.1 inches) | |
| Because of the higher ground clearance, Land Rover Defender can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.50 m | 4.34 m | |
| Width: | 2.00 m | 1.82 m | |
| Height: | 1.97 m | 1.67 m | |
|
Land Rover Defender is larger. Land Rover Defender is 16 cm longer than the Nissan Terrano, 17 cm wider, while the height of Land Rover Defender is 31 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 1355 litres | 475 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
1563 litres | no data | |
|
Land Rover Defender has more luggage capacity. Land Rover Defender has 880 litres more trunk space than the Nissan Terrano. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 12 meters | 10.4 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Land Rover Defender is 1.6 metres more than that of the Nissan Terrano, which means Land Rover Defender can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight: | ~ 2`986 kg | ~ 1`796 kg | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 51 400 | no data | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Land Rover Defender has
|
Nissan Terrano has
| |