Land Rover Defender 2019 vs Nissan X-Trail 2003
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Land Rover Defender is available only with automatic gearbox, whereas Nissan X-Trail has both automatic and manual transmission options. | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | Front wheel drive (FWD) / All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
| Land Rover Defender is available only with four wheel (4x4) drive, while Nissan X-Trail can be equipped with front wheel drive and four wheel (4x4) drive. All-wheel drive models tend to consume more fuel, so if you don't need off road capabilities, Nissan X-Trail also offers 2-wheel drive versions for fuel economy. 2WD versions also have lower maintenance costs. | |||
| Engines: | 2.0 - 5.0 (petrol, diesel, hybrid) | 2.0 - 2.5 (petrol, diesel) | |
| Both cars are available with petrol and diesel engines. Land Rover Defender is available also with hybrid engines. Hybrid engines offer superior fuel efficiency and reduced emissions compared to conventional engine types. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 200 - 635 HP | 136 - 165 HP | |
| Torque: | 350 - 750 NM | 192 - 314 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 4 - 10.3 seconds | 9.9 - 13.1 seconds | |
| In general, Land Rover Defender are available with more powerful and dynamic engines than Nissan X-Trail. Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 2.8 - 14.7 | 7.1 - 10.0 | |
|
Land Rover Defender petrol engines consumes on average 3.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than Nissan X-Trail. On average, Land Rover Defender equipped with diesel engines consume 0.8 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Nissan X-Trail. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 5.02 m | 4.51 m | |
| Width: | 2.00 m | 1.76 m | |
| Height: | 1.97 m | 1.70 m | |
|
Land Rover Defender is larger. Land Rover Defender is 51 cm longer than the Nissan X-Trail, 24 cm wider, while the height of Land Rover Defender is 27 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 2059 litres | 410 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
2277 litres | 1841 litres | |
|
Land Rover Defender has more luggage capacity. Land Rover Defender has 1649 litres more trunk space than the Nissan X-Trail. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Land Rover Defender (by 436 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 13.1 meters | 10.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Land Rover Defender is 2.5 metres more than that of the Nissan X-Trail, which means Land Rover Defender can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight: | ~ 3`242 kg | ~ 2`009 kg | |
| Net weight: | ~ 2`392 kg | ~ 1`466 kg | |
| Load capacity: | ~ 850 kg | ~ 543 kg | |
| Land Rover Defender load capacity (permitted cargo and passenger weight) is par apmēram 36 procentiem more than Nissan X-Trail. Therefore, Land Rover Defender is more suitable for longer family trips or transporting heavier loads. | |||
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | average | |
| Average price (€): | 58 000 | 1800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Land Rover Defender has
|
Nissan X-Trail has
| |