Land Rover Defender 2019 vs Mazda CX-9 2016
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | Front wheel drive (FWD) / All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
| Land Rover Defender is available only with four wheel (4x4) drive, while Mazda CX-9 can be equipped with front wheel drive and four wheel (4x4) drive. All-wheel drive models tend to consume more fuel, so if you don't need off road capabilities, Mazda CX-9 also offers 2-wheel drive versions for fuel economy. 2WD versions also have lower maintenance costs. | |||
| Engines: | 2.0 - 5.0 (petrol, diesel) | 2.5 (petrol) | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 200 - 525 HP | 231 HP | |
| Torque: | 400 - 625 NM | 420 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 5.4 - 10.3 seconds | n/a seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.7 - 12.8 | 8.4 - 8.8 | |
|
Land Rover Defender petrol engines consumes on average 2.8 litres more fuel per 100 km than Mazda CX-9. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 5.02 m | 5.08 m | |
| Width: | 2.01 m | 1.97 m | |
| Height: | 1.97 m | 1.75 m | |
| Land Rover Defender is 6 cm shorter than the Mazda CX-9, 4 cm wider, while the height of Land Rover Defender is 22 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 972 litres | 407 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
2277 litres | 2017 litres | |
|
Land Rover Defender has more luggage capacity. Even though the car is shorter, Land Rover Defender has 565 litres more trunk space than the Mazda CX-9. The Mazda CX-9 may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Land Rover Defender (by 260 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 13.1 meters | 11.8 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Land Rover Defender is 1.3 metres more than that of the Mazda CX-9, which means Land Rover Defender can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 3`199 | ~ 2`605 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 68 000 | no data | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Land Rover Defender has
|
Mazda CX-9 has
| |