Lada NIVA (2121) 1994 vs Suzuki Vitara 1988
Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 1.7 Petrol | 1.6 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 76 HP | 80 HP | |
Torque: | 125 NM | 127 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 19 seconds | 15 seconds | |
Suzuki Vitara is a more dynamic driving. Lada NIVA (2121) engine produces 4 HP less power than Suzuki Vitara, whereas torque is 2 NM less than Suzuki Vitara. Due to the lower power, Lada NIVA (2121) reaches 100 km/h speed 4 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 11.2 | 8.5 | |
The Suzuki Vitara is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Lada NIVA (2121) consumes 2.7 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Suzuki Vitara, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Lada NIVA (2121) could require 405 litres more fuel. | |||
Fuel tank capacity: | 42 litres | 42 litres | |
Full fuel tank distance: | 370 km in combined cycle | 490 km in combined cycle | |
500 km on highway | 560 km on highway | ||
Suzuki Vitara gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 3.74 m | 3.62 m | |
Width: | 1.68 m | 1.63 m | |
Height: | 1.64 m | 1.70 m | |
Lada NIVA (2121) is larger, but lower. Lada NIVA (2121) is 12 cm longer than the Suzuki Vitara, 5 cm wider, while the height of Lada NIVA (2121) is 6 cm lower. | |||
Trunk capacity: | no data | 123 litres | |
Turning diameter: | no data | no data | |
Gross weight (kg): | 1`610 | no data | |
Safety: | no data | no data | |
Quality: | no data | above average | |
Average price (€): | 1800 | 2600 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Lada NIVA (2121) has
|
Suzuki Vitara has
| |