Lada NIVA (2121) 1994 vs Mitsubishi Outlander 2003
Gearbox: | Manual | Automatic | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 1.7 Petrol | 2.4 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 76 HP | 160 HP | |
Torque: | 125 NM | 213 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 19 seconds | 11.2 seconds | |
Mitsubishi Outlander is a more dynamic driving. Lada NIVA (2121) engine produces 84 HP less power than Mitsubishi Outlander, whereas torque is 88 NM less than Mitsubishi Outlander. Due to the lower power, Lada NIVA (2121) reaches 100 km/h speed 7.8 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 11.2 | 10.1 | |
The Mitsubishi Outlander is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Lada NIVA (2121) consumes 1.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mitsubishi Outlander, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Lada NIVA (2121) could require 165 litres more fuel. | |||
Fuel tank capacity: | 42 litres | 59 litres | |
Full fuel tank distance: | 370 km in combined cycle | 580 km in combined cycle | |
500 km on highway | 730 km on highway | ||
Mitsubishi Outlander gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 3.74 m | 4.54 m | |
Width: | 1.68 m | 1.75 m | |
Height: | 1.64 m | 1.62 m | |
Lada NIVA (2121) is smaller, but slightly higher. Lada NIVA (2121) is 80 cm shorter than the Mitsubishi Outlander, 7 cm narrower, while the height of Lada NIVA (2121) is 2 cm higher. | |||
Trunk capacity: | no data | 402 litres | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1705 litres | |
Turning diameter: | no data | 11.4 meters | |
Gross weight (kg): | 1`610 | 2`070 | |
Safety: | no data | no data | |
Quality: | no data | no data | |
Average price (€): | 1800 | 1800 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Lada NIVA (2121) has
|
Mitsubishi Outlander has
| |