Lada NIVA (2121) 1994 vs Mazda Tribute 2001
Gearbox: | Manual | Automatic | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 1.7 Petrol | 3.0 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 76 HP | 197 HP | |
Torque: | 125 NM | 265 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 19 seconds | 11.8 seconds | |
Mazda Tribute is a more dynamic driving. Lada NIVA (2121) engine produces 121 HP less power than Mazda Tribute, whereas torque is 140 NM less than Mazda Tribute. Due to the lower power, Lada NIVA (2121) reaches 100 km/h speed 7.2 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 11.2 | 12.8 | |
The Lada NIVA (2121) is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Lada NIVA (2121) consumes 1.6 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mazda Tribute, which means that by driving the Lada NIVA (2121) over 15,000 km in a year you can save 240 litres of fuel. | |||
Fuel tank capacity: | 42 litres | 62 litres | |
Full fuel tank distance: | 370 km in combined cycle | 480 km in combined cycle | |
500 km on highway | 660 km on highway | ||
Mazda Tribute gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 3.74 m | 4.40 m | |
Width: | 1.68 m | 1.82 m | |
Height: | 1.64 m | 1.71 m | |
Lada NIVA (2121) is smaller. Lada NIVA (2121) is 66 cm shorter than the Mazda Tribute, 14 cm narrower, while the height of Lada NIVA (2121) is 7 cm lower. | |||
Trunk capacity: | no data | 457 litres | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 2245 litres | |
Turning diameter: | no data | 11.2 meters | |
Gross weight (kg): | 1`610 | 2`075 | |
Safety: | no data | no data | |
Quality: | no data | no data | |
Average price (€): | 1800 | 3200 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Lada NIVA (2121) has
|
Mazda Tribute has
| |