Lada NIVA (2121) 1977 vs Suzuki Vitara 1988
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Lada NIVA (2121) is available only with manual gearbox, whereas Suzuki Vitara has both automatic and manual transmission options. | |||
| Engines: | 1.3 - 1.9 (petrol) | 1.6 - 2.0 (petrol, diesel) | |
| Both cars are available with petrol engines. Suzuki Vitara is available also with diesel engines. Diesel engines typically offer better fuel efficiency and higher torque compared to other engine types. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 64 - 80 HP | 71 - 136 HP | |
| Torque: | 92 - 128 NM | 127 - 216 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 19 - 26 seconds | 12.5 - 19.8 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.7 - 13.1 | 7.8 - 10.9 | |
|
Lada NIVA (2121) petrol engines consumes on average 2.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than Suzuki Vitara. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.83 m | 4.02 m | |
| Width: | 1.68 m | 1.67 m | |
| Height: | 1.67 m | 1.70 m | |
| Lada NIVA (2121) is 19 cm shorter than the Suzuki Vitara, width is practically the same , while the height of Lada NIVA (2121) is 3 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 580 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1300 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | no data | 11 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`671 | ~ 1`844 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | above average | |
| Average price (€): | 1800 | 3000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Lada NIVA (2121) has
|
Suzuki Vitara has
| |