Lada NIVA (2121) 1977 vs Suzuki Grand Vitara 1999
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Lada NIVA (2121) is available only with manual gearbox, whereas Suzuki Grand Vitara has both automatic and manual transmission options. | |||
| Engines: | 1.3 - 1.9 (petrol) | 1.6 - 2.0 (petrol, diesel) | |
| Both cars are available with petrol engines. Suzuki Grand Vitara is available also with diesel engines. Diesel engines typically offer better fuel efficiency and higher torque compared to other engine types. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 64 - 80 HP | 94 - 128 HP | |
| Torque: | 92 - 128 NM | 138 - 270 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 19 - 26 seconds | 13.2 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.7 - 13.1 | 7.3 - 9.8 | |
|
Lada NIVA (2121) petrol engines consumes on average 2.4 litres more fuel per 100 km than Suzuki Grand Vitara. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.83 m | 3.92 m | |
| Width: | 1.68 m | 1.78 m | |
| Height: | 1.67 m | 1.74 m | |
|
Lada NIVA (2121) is smaller. Lada NIVA (2121) is 9 cm shorter than the Suzuki Grand Vitara, 10 cm narrower, while the height of Lada NIVA (2121) is 7 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 258 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 828 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | no data | 9.4 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`671 | ~ 1`600 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | above average | |
| Average price (€): | 1600 | 2400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Lada NIVA (2121) has
|
Suzuki Grand Vitara has
| |