Lada Kalina 2004 vs Kia RIO 2003
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.4 Petrol | 1.3 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 89 HP | 82 HP | |
| Torque: | 120 NM | 116 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12.9 seconds | 14.3 seconds | |
|
Lada Kalina is more dynamic to drive. Lada Kalina engine produces 7 HP more power than Kia RIO, whereas torque is 4 NM more than Kia RIO. Thanks to more power Lada Kalina reaches 100 km/h speed 1.4 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 9.0 | 6.7 | |
|
The Kia RIO is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Lada Kalina consumes 2.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Kia RIO, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Lada Kalina could require 345 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 50 litres | 45 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 550 km in combined cycle | 670 km in combined cycle | |
| 640 km on highway | 830 km on highway | ||
| Kia RIO gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.04 m | 4.24 m | |
| Width: | 1.67 m | 1.68 m | |
| Height: | 1.50 m | 1.42 m | |
|
Lada Kalina is smaller, but higher. Lada Kalina is 20 cm shorter than the Kia RIO, 1 cm narrower, while the height of Lada Kalina is 8 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 326 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | no data | 9.5 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | no data | 1`470 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | below average | |
| Average price (€): | no data | 1200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Lada Kalina has
|
Kia RIO has
| |