Lada Kalina 2004 vs Kia RIO 2003
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.6 Petrol | 1.5 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 81 HP | 97 HP | |
| Torque: | 120 NM | 132 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12.9 seconds | 11.6 seconds | |
|
Kia RIO is a more dynamic driving. Lada Kalina engine produces 16 HP less power than Kia RIO, whereas torque is 12 NM less than Kia RIO. Due to the lower power, Lada Kalina reaches 100 km/h speed 1.3 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 9.0 | 7.1 | |
|
The Kia RIO is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Lada Kalina consumes 1.9 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Kia RIO, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Lada Kalina could require 285 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 50 litres | 45 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 550 km in combined cycle | 630 km in combined cycle | |
| 640 km on highway | 760 km on highway | ||
| Kia RIO gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.04 m | 4.24 m | |
| Width: | 1.67 m | 1.68 m | |
| Height: | 1.50 m | 1.42 m | |
|
Lada Kalina is smaller, but higher. Lada Kalina is 20 cm shorter than the Kia RIO, 1 cm narrower, while the height of Lada Kalina is 8 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 326 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | no data | 9.5 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`555 | 1`500 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | below average | |
| Average price (€): | no data | 1200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
|
Kia RIO has
| |