Lada Kalina 2013 vs Renault Clio 2013
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.6 Petrol | 1.2 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 106 HP | 120 HP | |
| Torque: | 148 NM | 190 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 13.1 seconds | n/a seconds | |
| Lada Kalina engine produces 14 HP less power than Renault Clio, whereas torque is 42 NM less than Renault Clio. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.7 | 5.2 | |
|
The Renault Clio is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Lada Kalina consumes 1.5 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Renault Clio, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Lada Kalina could require 225 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 50 litres | 45 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 740 km in combined cycle | 860 km in combined cycle | |
| 900 km on highway | 1020 km on highway | ||
| Renault Clio gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.10 m | no data | |
| Width: | 1.70 m | no data | |
| Height: | 1.56 m | no data | |
| Trunk capacity: | 355 litres | 443 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
670 litres | no data | |
|
Renault Clio has more luggage space. Lada Kalina has 88 litres less trunk space than the Renault Clio. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.4 meters | 10.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Lada Kalina is 0.2 metres less than that of the Renault Clio. | |||
| Gross weight: | 1`560 kg | 1`705 kg | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | below average | |
| Average price (€): | no data | 5600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
|
Renault Clio has
| |