Lada Kalina 2013 vs Skoda Fabia 2015

 
Lada Kalina
2013 - 2018
Skoda Fabia
2015 - 2018
Gearbox: ManualManual
Engine: 1.6 Petrol1.2 Petrol

Performance

Power: 87 HP90 HP
Torque: 140 NM160 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 12.2 seconds11 seconds
Skoda Fabia is a more dynamic driving.
Lada Kalina engine produces 3 HP less power than Skoda Fabia, whereas torque is 20 NM less than Skoda Fabia. Due to the lower power, Lada Kalina reaches 100 km/h speed 1.2 seconds later.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 7.24.7
The Skoda Fabia is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy.
Lada Kalina consumes 2.5 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Skoda Fabia, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Lada Kalina could require 375 litres more fuel.
Fuel tank capacity: 50 litres45 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 690 km in combined cycle950 km in combined cycle
Skoda Fabia gets more mileage on one fuel tank.

Dimensions

Length: 4.10 m4.26 m
Width: 1.70 m1.73 m
Height: 1.56 m1.47 m
Lada Kalina is smaller, but higher.
Lada Kalina is 15 cm shorter than the Skoda Fabia, 3 cm narrower, while the height of Lada Kalina is 9 cm higher.
Trunk capacity: 355 litres530 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
670 litres1395 litres
Skoda Fabia has more luggage space.
Lada Kalina has 175 litres less trunk space than the Skoda Fabia. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Skoda Fabia (by 725 litres).
Turning diameter: 10.4 meters10.4 meters
Gross weight (kg): 1`5601`588
Safety: no datano data
Quality: no data
average
Average price (€): no data7200
Pros and Cons:
    Skoda Fabia has
    • more dynamic
    • lower fuel consumption
    • more full fuel tank mileage
    • roomier boot
    Share these results to social networks or e-mail
    Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv