Lada Kalina 2013 vs Renault Clio 2013
| Gearbox: | Manual | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.6 Petrol | 1.2 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 87 HP | 120 HP | |
| Torque: | 140 NM | 190 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12.2 seconds | n/a seconds | |
| Lada Kalina engine produces 33 HP less power than Renault Clio, whereas torque is 50 NM less than Renault Clio. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.2 | 5.2 | |
|
The Renault Clio is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Lada Kalina consumes 2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Renault Clio, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Lada Kalina could require 300 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 50 litres | 45 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 690 km in combined cycle | 860 km in combined cycle | |
| Renault Clio gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.10 m | no data | |
| Width: | 1.70 m | no data | |
| Height: | 1.56 m | no data | |
| Trunk capacity: | 355 litres | 443 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
670 litres | no data | |
|
Renault Clio has more luggage space. Lada Kalina has 88 litres less trunk space than the Renault Clio. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.4 meters | 10.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Lada Kalina is 0.2 metres less than that of the Renault Clio. | |||
| Gross weight: | 1`560 kg | 1`705 kg | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | below average | |
| Average price (€): | no data | 5600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
|
Renault Clio has
| |