Lada Kalina 2013 vs Renault Clio 2013

 
Lada Kalina
2013 - 2018
Renault Clio
2013 - 2016
Gearbox: ManualAutomatic
Engine: 1.6 Petrol1.2 Petrol

Performance

Power: 87 HP120 HP
Torque: 140 NM190 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 12.6 secondsn/a seconds
Lada Kalina engine produces 33 HP less power than Renault Clio, whereas torque is 50 NM less than Renault Clio.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 7.55.2
The Renault Clio is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy.
Lada Kalina consumes 2.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Renault Clio, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Lada Kalina could require 345 litres more fuel.
Fuel tank capacity: 50 litres45 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 660 km in combined cycle860 km in combined cycle
830 km on highway1020 km on highway
Renault Clio gets more mileage on one fuel tank.
Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy.

Dimensions

Length: 4.08 mno data
Width: 1.70 mno data
Height: 1.50 mno data
Trunk capacity: 355 litres443 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down, if possible
670 litresno data
Renault Clio has more luggage space.
Lada Kalina has 88 litres less trunk space than the Renault Clio.
Turning diameter: 10.4 meters10.6 meters
The turning circle of the Lada Kalina is 0.2 metres less than that of the Renault Clio.
Gross weight: 1`560 kg1`705 kg
Net weight:1`125 kg1`199 kg
Load capacity:435 kg506 kg
Lada Kalina load capacity (permitted cargo and passenger weight) is par apmēram 16 procentiem less than Renault Clio. Therefore, Renault Clio is more suitable for longer family trips or transporting heavier loads.
Safety: no data
Quality: no data
below average
Average price (€): no data5600
Pros and Cons:
    Renault Clio has
    • more power
    • lower fuel consumption
    • more full fuel tank mileage
    • roomier boot
    • higher carrying (cargo) capacity
    Share these results to social networks or e-mail
    Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv