Lada Kalina 2013 vs Seat Ibiza 2012
Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 1.6 Petrol | 1.4 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 98 HP | 150 HP | |
Torque: | 145 NM | 220 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 13.8 seconds | 8 seconds | |
Seat Ibiza is a more dynamic driving. Lada Kalina engine produces 52 HP less power than Seat Ibiza, whereas torque is 75 NM less than Seat Ibiza. Due to the lower power, Lada Kalina reaches 100 km/h speed 5.8 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.6 | 5.9 | |
The Seat Ibiza is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Lada Kalina consumes 2.7 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Seat Ibiza, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Lada Kalina could require 405 litres more fuel. | |||
Fuel tank capacity: | 50 litres | 45 litres | |
Full fuel tank distance: | 580 km in combined cycle | 760 km in combined cycle | |
760 km on highway | 880 km on highway | ||
Seat Ibiza gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.08 m | 4.23 m | |
Width: | 1.70 m | 1.69 m | |
Height: | 1.50 m | 1.45 m | |
Lada Kalina is 14 cm shorter than the Seat Ibiza, width is practically the same , while the height of Lada Kalina is 6 cm higher. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 355 litres | 430 litres | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
670 litres | no data | |
Seat Ibiza has more luggage space. Lada Kalina has 75 litres less trunk space than the Seat Ibiza. | |||
Turning diameter: | 10.4 meters | 10.5 meters | |
The turning circle of the Lada Kalina is 0.1 metres less than that of the Seat Ibiza. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | 1`560 | 1`735 | |
Safety: | no data | ||
Quality: | no data | below average | |
Average price (€): | no data | 4800 | |
Pros and Cons: |
|
Seat Ibiza has
| |