Lada Kalina 2013 vs Dacia Logan 2016
| Body: | Estate car / wagon | Sedan | |
|---|---|---|---|
| The wagon generally has more cargo space due to a larger trunk door opening, a roof that extends as far back as possible, and the ability to convert the rear of the passenger compartment into cargo space. Sedans tend to be quieter than wagons due to a more isolated rear area. | |||
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
| Engine: | 1.6 Petrol | 1.5 Diesel | |
| Petrol engines (Lada Kalina) are generally quieter, smoother, and better suited for short trips due to quicker warm-up times. Diesel (Dacia Logan) engines, on the other hand, offer superior fuel efficiency and torque, making them ideal for long-distance driving and heavy loads. Read more: Petrol vs. Diesel: Fuel Economy and Key Differences. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 106 HP | 90 HP | |
| Torque: | 148 NM | 220 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12.9 seconds | n/a seconds | |
| Lada Kalina engine produces 16 HP more power than Dacia Logan, but torque is 72 NM less than Dacia Logan. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.7 | 3.7 | |
|
The Dacia Logan is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Lada Kalina consumes 3 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Dacia Logan, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Lada Kalina could require 450 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 50 litres | 50 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 740 km in combined cycle | 1350 km in combined cycle | |
| 890 km on highway | 1350 km on highway | ||
| Dacia Logan gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
| Dacia Logan 2016 1.5 engine: The engine has undergone numerous modifications and is relatively commonplace, with a plentiful supply of spare parts. It exhibits an optimal fuel consumption/power ratio. However, the fuel injection system ... More about Dacia Logan 2016 1.5 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.08 m | 4.35 m | |
| Width: | 1.70 m | 1.73 m | |
| Height: | 1.50 m | 1.52 m | |
|
Lada Kalina is smaller. Lada Kalina is 26 cm shorter than the Dacia Logan, 3 cm narrower, while the height of Lada Kalina is 1 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 355 litres | 510 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
670 litres | 1257 litres | |
|
Dacia Logan has more luggage space. Lada Kalina has 155 litres less trunk space than the Dacia Logan. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Dacia Logan (by 587 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.4 meters | 10.8 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Lada Kalina is 0.4 metres less than that of the Dacia Logan, which means Lada Kalina can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight: | 1`560 kg | 1`625 kg | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | low | |
| Average price (€): | no data | 6000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Lada Kalina has
|
Dacia Logan has
| |