Lada Kalina 2013 vs Ford KA 2016
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.6 Petrol | 1.2 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 118 HP | 70 HP | |
| Torque: | 154 NM | 105 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.5 seconds | 15.3 seconds | |
|
Lada Kalina is more dynamic to drive. Lada Kalina engine produces 48 HP more power than Ford KA, whereas torque is 49 NM more than Ford KA. Thanks to more power Lada Kalina reaches 100 km/h speed 5.8 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.8 | 5.0 | |
|
The Ford KA is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Lada Kalina consumes 2.8 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Ford KA, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Lada Kalina could require 420 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 50 litres | 42 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 640 km in combined cycle | 840 km in combined cycle | |
| 890 km on highway | 1050 km on highway | ||
| Ford KA gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.94 m | 3.93 m | |
| Width: | 1.70 m | 1.70 m | |
| Height: | 1.45 m | 1.52 m | |
|
Lada Kalina is larger, but lower. Lada Kalina is 1 cm longer than the Ford KA, width is practically the same , while the height of Lada Kalina is 7 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 240 litres | 270 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
550 litres | no data | |
|
Ford KA has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, Lada Kalina has 30 litres less trunk space than the Ford KA. This could mean that the Lada Kalina uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.4 meters | no data | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`626 | no data | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | low | |
| Average price (€): | no data | no data | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Lada Kalina has
|
Ford KA has
| |