Lada Kalina 2013 vs Citroen C3 2013

 
Lada Kalina
2013 - 2018
Citroen C3
2013 - 2016
Gearbox: ManualManual
Engine: 1.6 Petrol1.6 Petrol

Performance

Power: 118 HP120 HP
Torque: 154 NM156 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 9.5 seconds8.9 seconds
Citroen C3 is a more dynamic driving.
Lada Kalina engine produces 2 HP less power than Citroen C3, whereas torque is 2 NM less than Citroen C3. Due to the lower power, Lada Kalina reaches 100 km/h speed 0.6 seconds later.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 7.85.9
The Citroen C3 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy.
Lada Kalina consumes 1.9 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Citroen C3, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Lada Kalina could require 285 litres more fuel.
Fuel tank capacity: 50 litres50 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 640 km in combined cycle840 km in combined cycle
890 km on highway1040 km on highway
Citroen C3 gets more mileage on one fuel tank.

Dimensions

Length: 3.94 m3.94 m
Width: 1.70 m1.73 m
Height: 1.45 m1.52 m
Lada Kalina and Citroen C3 are practically the same length.
Trunk capacity: 240 litres300 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
550 litresno data
Citroen C3 has more luggage space.
Lada Kalina has 60 litres less trunk space than the Citroen C3.
Turning diameter: 10.4 meters10.2 meters
The turning circle of the Lada Kalina is 0.2 metres more than that of the Citroen C3.
Gross weight (kg): 1`6261`579
Safety: no datano data
Quality: no data
low
Average price (€): no data7800
Pros and Cons:
    Citroen C3 has
    • more dynamic
    • lower fuel consumption
    • more full fuel tank mileage
    • roomier boot
    Share these results to social networks or e-mail
    Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv