Lada Kalina 2013 vs Citroen C3 2013
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.6 Petrol | 1.6 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 106 HP | 120 HP | |
| Torque: | 148 NM | 156 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11 seconds | 8.9 seconds | |
|
Citroen C3 is a more dynamic driving. Lada Kalina engine produces 14 HP less power than Citroen C3, whereas torque is 8 NM less than Citroen C3. Due to the lower power, Lada Kalina reaches 100 km/h speed 2.1 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.2 | 5.9 | |
|
The Citroen C3 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Lada Kalina consumes 2.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Citroen C3, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Lada Kalina could require 345 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 50 litres | 50 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 600 km in combined cycle | 840 km in combined cycle | |
| 760 km on highway | 1040 km on highway | ||
| Citroen C3 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.89 m | 3.94 m | |
| Width: | 1.70 m | 1.73 m | |
| Height: | 1.50 m | 1.52 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Lada Kalina is 5 cm shorter than the Citroen C3, 3 cm narrower, while the height of Lada Kalina is 2 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 240 litres | 300 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
550 litres | no data | |
|
Citroen C3 has more luggage space. Lada Kalina has 60 litres less trunk space than the Citroen C3. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.4 meters | 10.2 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Lada Kalina is 0.2 metres more than that of the Citroen C3. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`560 | 1`579 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | low | |
| Average price (€): | no data | 7800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
|
Citroen C3 has
| |