Lada Kalina 2013 vs Volvo V40 2016
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.6 Petrol | 1.5 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 106 HP | 152 HP | |
| Torque: | 148 NM | 250 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12.9 seconds | 8.3 seconds | |
|
Volvo V40 is a more dynamic driving. Lada Kalina engine produces 46 HP less power than Volvo V40, whereas torque is 102 NM less than Volvo V40. Due to the lower power, Lada Kalina reaches 100 km/h speed 4.6 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.7 | no data | |
| Fuel tank capacity: | 50 litres | 62 litres | |
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.89 m | 4.37 m | |
| Width: | 1.70 m | 1.80 m | |
| Height: | 1.50 m | 1.44 m | |
|
Lada Kalina is smaller, but higher. Lada Kalina is 48 cm shorter than the Volvo V40, 10 cm narrower, while the height of Lada Kalina is 6 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 240 litres | 324 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
550 litres | 1500 litres | |
|
Volvo V40 has more luggage space. Lada Kalina has 84 litres less trunk space than the Volvo V40. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Volvo V40 (by 950 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.4 meters | 10.8 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Lada Kalina is 0.4 metres less than that of the Volvo V40, which means Lada Kalina can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`560 | no data | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | above average | |
| Average price (€): | no data | 11 400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
|
Volvo V40 has
| |