Lada Kalina 2013 vs Honda Jazz 2011
Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 1.6 Petrol | 1.3 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 87 HP | 99 HP | |
Torque: | 140 NM | 127 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 14.2 seconds | 12.6 seconds | |
Honda Jazz is a more dynamic driving. Lada Kalina engine produces 12 HP less power than Honda Jazz, but torque is 13 NM more than Honda Jazz. Due to the lower power, Lada Kalina reaches 100 km/h speed 1.6 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.7 | 5.4 | |
The Honda Jazz is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Lada Kalina consumes 2.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Honda Jazz, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Lada Kalina could require 345 litres more fuel. | |||
Fuel tank capacity: | 50 litres | 42 litres | |
Full fuel tank distance: | 640 km in combined cycle | 770 km in combined cycle | |
810 km on highway | 910 km on highway | ||
Honda Jazz gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 3.89 m | 3.90 m | |
Width: | 1.70 m | 1.70 m | |
Height: | 1.50 m | 1.53 m | |
Both cars are similar in size. Lada Kalina and Honda Jazz are practically the same length. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 240 litres | 337 litres | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
550 litres | 883 litres | |
Honda Jazz has more luggage space. Lada Kalina has 97 litres less trunk space than the Honda Jazz. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Honda Jazz (by 333 litres). | |||
Turning diameter: | 10.4 meters | 10.1 meters | |
The turning circle of the Lada Kalina is 0.3 metres more than that of the Honda Jazz. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | 1`560 | 1`535 | |
Safety: | no data | ||
Quality: | no data | above average | |
Average price (€): | no data | 5400 | |
Pros and Cons: |
|
Honda Jazz has
| |