Lada Kalina 2013 vs Ford KA 2016
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.6 Petrol | 1.2 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 87 HP | 70 HP | |
| Torque: | 140 NM | 105 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 14.2 seconds | 15.3 seconds | |
|
Lada Kalina is more dynamic to drive. Lada Kalina engine produces 17 HP more power than Ford KA, whereas torque is 35 NM more than Ford KA. Thanks to more power Lada Kalina reaches 100 km/h speed 1.1 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.7 | 5.0 | |
|
The Ford KA is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Lada Kalina consumes 2.7 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Ford KA, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Lada Kalina could require 405 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 50 litres | 42 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 640 km in combined cycle | 840 km in combined cycle | |
| 810 km on highway | 1050 km on highway | ||
| Ford KA gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.89 m | 3.93 m | |
| Width: | 1.70 m | 1.70 m | |
| Height: | 1.50 m | 1.52 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Lada Kalina is 4 cm shorter than the Ford KA, width is practically the same , while the height of Lada Kalina is 2 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 240 litres | 270 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
550 litres | no data | |
|
Ford KA has more luggage space. Lada Kalina has 30 litres less trunk space than the Ford KA. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.4 meters | no data | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`560 | no data | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | low | |
| Average price (€): | no data | no data | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Lada Kalina has
|
Ford KA has
| |