Lada Kalina 2004 vs Mitsubishi Colt 2005
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.6 Petrol | 1.5 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 98 HP | 150 HP | |
| Torque: | 145 NM | 210 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | 8 seconds | |
| Lada Kalina engine produces 52 HP less power than Mitsubishi Colt, whereas torque is 65 NM less than Mitsubishi Colt. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.2 | 6.8 | |
|
The Mitsubishi Colt is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Lada Kalina consumes 0.4 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mitsubishi Colt, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Lada Kalina could require 60 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 50 litres | 47 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 690 km in combined cycle | 690 km in combined cycle | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.85 m | 3.82 m | |
| Width: | 1.70 m | 1.70 m | |
| Height: | 1.50 m | 1.55 m | |
| Lada Kalina is 3 cm longer than the Mitsubishi Colt, width is practically the same , while the height of Lada Kalina is 5 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 155 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 760 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | no data | 10.8 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`555 | 1`520 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | above average | |
| Average price (€): | no data | 1600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
|
Mitsubishi Colt has
| |