Lada Kalina 2004 vs Mercedes A class 2004
Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 1.6 Petrol | 1.5 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 81 HP | 95 HP | |
Torque: | 120 NM | 140 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12.9 seconds | 12.6 seconds | |
Mercedes A class is a more dynamic driving. Lada Kalina engine produces 14 HP less power than Mercedes A class, whereas torque is 20 NM less than Mercedes A class. Due to the lower power, Lada Kalina reaches 100 km/h speed 0.3 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.8 | 6.2 | |
The Mercedes A class is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Lada Kalina consumes 1.6 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mercedes A class, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Lada Kalina could require 240 litres more fuel. | |||
Fuel tank capacity: | 50 litres | 54 litres | |
Full fuel tank distance: | 640 km in combined cycle | 870 km in combined cycle | |
810 km on highway | 1000 km on highway | ||
Mercedes A class gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 3.85 m | 3.84 m | |
Width: | 1.70 m | 1.76 m | |
Height: | 1.50 m | 1.59 m | |
Lada Kalina is 1 cm longer than the Mercedes A class, 6 cm narrower, while the height of Lada Kalina is 9 cm lower. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 235 litres | 435 litres | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1995 litres | |
Mercedes A class has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, Lada Kalina has 200 litres less trunk space than the Mercedes A class. This could mean that the Lada Kalina uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. | |||
Turning diameter: | no data | 11 meters | |
Gross weight (kg): | 1`555 | 1`690 | |
Safety: | no data | ||
Quality: | no data | above average | |
Average price (€): | no data | 2000 | |
Pros and Cons: |
|
Mercedes A klase has
| |