Lada Kalina 2004 vs Mitsubishi Colt 2005
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.6 Petrol | 1.5 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 81 HP | 150 HP | |
| Torque: | 120 NM | 210 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12.9 seconds | 8 seconds | |
|
Mitsubishi Colt is a more dynamic driving. Lada Kalina engine produces 69 HP less power than Mitsubishi Colt, whereas torque is 90 NM less than Mitsubishi Colt. Due to the lower power, Lada Kalina reaches 100 km/h speed 4.9 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.8 | 6.8 | |
|
The Mitsubishi Colt is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Lada Kalina consumes 1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mitsubishi Colt, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Lada Kalina could require 150 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 50 litres | 47 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 640 km in combined cycle | 690 km in combined cycle | |
| 810 km on highway | 820 km on highway | ||
| Mitsubishi Colt gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.85 m | 3.82 m | |
| Width: | 1.70 m | 1.70 m | |
| Height: | 1.50 m | 1.55 m | |
| Lada Kalina is 3 cm longer than the Mitsubishi Colt, width is practically the same , while the height of Lada Kalina is 5 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 235 litres | 155 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 760 litres | |
|
Lada Kalina has more luggage capacity. Lada Kalina has 80 litres more trunk space than the Mitsubishi Colt. | |||
| Turning diameter: | no data | 10.8 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`555 | 1`520 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | above average | |
| Average price (€): | no data | 1400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Lada Kalina has
|
Mitsubishi Colt has
| |