Lada Kalina 2004 vs Fiat Punto 2003
Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 1.6 Petrol | 1.4 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 81 HP | 95 HP | |
Torque: | 120 NM | 128 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12.9 seconds | 9.9 seconds | |
Fiat Punto is a more dynamic driving. Lada Kalina engine produces 14 HP less power than Fiat Punto, whereas torque is 8 NM less than Fiat Punto. Due to the lower power, Lada Kalina reaches 100 km/h speed 3 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.8 | 6.1 | |
The Fiat Punto is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Lada Kalina consumes 1.7 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Fiat Punto, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Lada Kalina could require 255 litres more fuel. | |||
Fuel tank capacity: | 50 litres | 47 litres | |
Full fuel tank distance: | 640 km in combined cycle | 770 km in combined cycle | |
810 km on highway | 920 km on highway | ||
Fiat Punto gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 3.85 m | 3.86 m | |
Width: | 1.70 m | 1.66 m | |
Height: | 1.50 m | 1.48 m | |
Lada Kalina is 1 cm shorter than the Fiat Punto, 4 cm wider, while the height of Lada Kalina is 2 cm higher. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 235 litres | 297 litres | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1080 litres | |
Fiat Punto has more luggage space. Lada Kalina has 62 litres less trunk space than the Fiat Punto. | |||
Turning diameter: | no data | 10.5 meters | |
Gross weight (kg): | 1`555 | 1`485 | |
Safety: | no data | no data | |
Quality: | no data | low | |
Average price (€): | no data | 1600 | |
Pros and Cons: |
|
Fiat Punto has
| |