Lada Kalina 2004 vs Citroen C3 2005
| Gearbox: | Manual | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.6 Petrol | 1.6 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 81 HP | 110 HP | |
| Torque: | 120 NM | 147 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12.9 seconds | 11.5 seconds | |
|
Citroen C3 is a more dynamic driving. Lada Kalina engine produces 29 HP less power than Citroen C3, whereas torque is 27 NM less than Citroen C3. Due to the lower power, Lada Kalina reaches 100 km/h speed 1.4 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.8 | 7.2 | |
|
The Citroen C3 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Lada Kalina consumes 0.6 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Citroen C3, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Lada Kalina could require 90 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 50 litres | 45 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 640 km in combined cycle | 620 km in combined cycle | |
| 810 km on highway | 810 km on highway | ||
| Citroen C3 2005 1.6 engine: Relatively reliable engine, the main problems tend to be with the engine control electronics. The engine is demanding on fuel quality and fuel consumption is relatively high. It is highly recommended to ... More about Citroen C3 2005 1.6 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.85 m | 3.85 m | |
| Width: | 1.70 m | 1.67 m | |
| Height: | 1.50 m | 1.52 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Lada Kalina and Citroen C3 are practically the same length. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 235 litres | 305 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1150 litres | |
|
Citroen C3 has more luggage space. Lada Kalina has 70 litres less trunk space than the Citroen C3. | |||
| Turning diameter: | no data | 11.6 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`555 | 1`597 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | below average | |
| Average price (€): | no data | 1600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
|
Citroen C3 has
| |