Lada Kalina 2004 vs Mitsubishi Colt 2005
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.6 Petrol | 1.5 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 81 HP | 150 HP | |
| Torque: | 120 NM | 210 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | 8 seconds | |
| Lada Kalina engine produces 69 HP less power than Mitsubishi Colt, whereas torque is 90 NM less than Mitsubishi Colt. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.8 | 6.8 | |
|
The Mitsubishi Colt is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Lada Kalina consumes 1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mitsubishi Colt, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Lada Kalina could require 150 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 50 litres | 47 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 640 km in combined cycle | 690 km in combined cycle | |
| Mitsubishi Colt gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.85 m | 3.82 m | |
| Width: | 1.70 m | 1.70 m | |
| Height: | 1.50 m | 1.55 m | |
| Lada Kalina is 3 cm longer than the Mitsubishi Colt, width is practically the same , while the height of Lada Kalina is 5 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 235 litres | 155 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 760 litres | |
|
Lada Kalina has more luggage capacity. Lada Kalina has 80 litres more trunk space than the Mitsubishi Colt. | |||
| Turning diameter: | no data | 10.8 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`555 | 1`520 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | above average | |
| Average price (€): | no data | 1600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Lada Kalina has
|
Mitsubishi Colt has
| |