Lada Kalina 2004 vs Citroen C3 2005
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.4 Petrol | 1.4 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 89 HP | 75 HP | |
| Torque: | 127 NM | 120 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | 12.4 seconds | |
| Lada Kalina engine produces 14 HP more power than Citroen C3, whereas torque is 7 NM more than Citroen C3. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.0 | 6.1 | |
|
The Citroen C3 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Lada Kalina consumes 0.9 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Citroen C3, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Lada Kalina could require 135 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 50 litres | 45 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 710 km in combined cycle | 730 km in combined cycle | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.85 m | 3.85 m | |
| Width: | 1.70 m | 1.67 m | |
| Height: | 1.50 m | 1.52 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Lada Kalina and Citroen C3 are practically the same length. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 235 litres | 305 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1150 litres | |
|
Citroen C3 has more luggage space. Lada Kalina has 70 litres less trunk space than the Citroen C3. | |||
| Turning diameter: | no data | 10.5 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`555 | 1`510 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | below average | |
| Average price (€): | no data | 1600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Lada Kalina has
|
Citroen C3 has
| |