Lada Kalina 2013 vs Ford Fiesta 2012
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 1.6 (petrol) | 1.0 - 1.6 (petrol, diesel) | |
| Both cars are available with petrol engines. Ford Fiesta is available also with diesel engines. Diesel engines typically offer better fuel efficiency and higher torque compared to other engine types. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 87 - 136 HP | 65 - 125 HP | |
| Torque: | 140 - 154 NM | 150 - 200 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.2 - 14.2 seconds | 9.4 - 16.8 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.7 - 8.5 | 3.3 - 5.9 | |
|
Lada Kalina petrol engines consumes on average 3.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than Ford Fiesta. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.91 m | 3.95 m | |
| Width: | 1.70 m | 1.72 m | |
| Height: | 1.49 m | 1.48 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Lada Kalina is 4 cm shorter than the Ford Fiesta, 2 cm narrower the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 240 litres | 295 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
550 litres | no data | |
|
Ford Fiesta has more luggage space. Lada Kalina has 55 litres less trunk space than the Ford Fiesta. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.4 meters | 10.2 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Lada Kalina is 0.2 metres more than that of the Ford Fiesta. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`588 | ~ 1`506 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | average | |
| Average price (€): | no data | 4600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Lada Kalina has
|
Ford Fiesta has
| |