Lada Kalina 2013 vs Honda Jazz 2011
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 1.6 | 1.2 - 1.3 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 87 - 136 HP | 90 - 102 HP | |
| Torque: | 140 - 154 NM | 114 - 127 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.2 - 14.2 seconds | 11.4 - 12.6 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.7 - 8.5 | 4.5 - 5.5 | |
|
Lada Kalina petrol engines consumes on average 2.7 litres more fuel per 100 km than Honda Jazz. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.91 m | 3.90 m | |
| Width: | 1.70 m | 1.70 m | |
| Height: | 1.49 m | 1.53 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Lada Kalina is 1 cm longer than the Honda Jazz, width is practically the same , while the height of Lada Kalina is 4 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 240 litres | 337 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
550 litres | 883 litres | |
|
Honda Jazz has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, Lada Kalina has 97 litres less trunk space than the Honda Jazz. This could mean that the Lada Kalina uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Honda Jazz (by 333 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.4 meters | 10.8 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Lada Kalina is 0.4 metres less than that of the Honda Jazz, which means Lada Kalina can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`588 | ~ 1`581 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | above average | |
| Average price (€): | no data | 5400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
|
Honda Jazz has
| |