Lada Kalina 2013 vs Ford KA 2016
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Lada Kalina is available with both manual and automatic gearboxes, whereas Ford KA is available only with manual gearbox. | |||
| Engines: | 1.6 | 1.2 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 87 - 136 HP | 70 - 85 HP | |
| Torque: | 140 - 154 NM | 105 - 112 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.2 - 14.2 seconds | 13.3 - 15.3 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.7 - 8.5 | 5.0 | |
|
Lada Kalina petrol engines consumes on average 2.9 litres more fuel per 100 km than Ford KA. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.91 m | 3.93 m | |
| Width: | 1.70 m | 1.70 m | |
| Height: | 1.49 m | 1.52 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Lada Kalina is 2 cm shorter than the Ford KA, width is practically the same , while the height of Lada Kalina is 4 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 240 litres | 270 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
550 litres | no data | |
|
Ford KA has more luggage space. Lada Kalina has 30 litres less trunk space than the Ford KA. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.4 meters | no data | |
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`588 | no data | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | low | |
| Average price (€): | no data | no data | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Lada Kalina has
|
Ford KA has
| |