Lada Kalina 2013 vs Citroen C3 2013
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
---|---|---|---|
Engines: | 1.6 (petrol) | 1.0 - 1.6 (petrol, diesel) | |
Both cars are available with petrol engines. Citroen C3 is available also with diesel engines. Diesel engines typically offer better fuel efficiency and higher torque compared to other engine types. | |||
Performance | |||
Power: | 87 - 136 HP | 68 - 120 HP | |
Torque: | 140 - 154 NM | 95 - 270 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.2 - 14.2 seconds | 8.9 - 16.2 seconds | |
Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.7 - 8.5 | 3.1 - 6.5 | |
Lada Kalina petrol engines consumes on average 2.8 litres more fuel per 100 km than Citroen C3. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 3.91 m | 3.94 m | |
Width: | 1.70 m | 1.73 m | |
Height: | 1.49 m | 1.52 m | |
Both cars are similar in size. Lada Kalina is 3 cm shorter than the Citroen C3, 3 cm narrower, while the height of Lada Kalina is 4 cm lower. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 240 litres | 300 litres | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
550 litres | no data | |
Citroen C3 has more luggage space. Lada Kalina has 60 litres less trunk space than the Citroen C3. | |||
Turning diameter: | 10.4 meters | 10.4 meters | |
Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`588 | ~ 1`594 | |
Safety: | no data | no data | |
Quality: | no data | low | |
Average price (€): | no data | 7800 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Lada Kalina has
|
Citroen C3 has
| |