Lada Kalina 2004 vs Mitsubishi Colt 2004
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Lada Kalina is available only with manual gearbox, whereas Mitsubishi Colt has both automatic and manual transmission options. | |||
| Engines: | 1.4 - 1.6 (petrol) | 1.1 - 1.5 (petrol, diesel) | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 81 - 98 HP | 68 - 150 HP | |
| Torque: | 120 - 145 NM | 100 - 210 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12.9 seconds | 8 - 14.5 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.0 - 7.8 | 4.4 - 6.8 | |
|
Lada Kalina petrol engines consumes on average 1.4 litres more fuel per 100 km than Mitsubishi Colt. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.85 m | 3.86 m | |
| Width: | 1.70 m | 1.70 m | |
| Height: | 1.50 m | 1.55 m | |
| Lada Kalina and Mitsubishi Colt are practically the same length. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 235 litres | 500 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 760 litres | |
|
Mitsubishi Colt has more luggage space. Lada Kalina has 265 litres less trunk space than the Mitsubishi Colt. | |||
| Turning diameter: | no data | 10.8 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`555 | ~ 1`497 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | above average | |
| Average price (€): | no data | 1600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Lada Kalina has
|
Mitsubishi Colt has
| |