Kia XCeed 2019 vs Mazda CX-30 2019
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.5 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 160 HP | 180 HP | |
| Torque: | 253 NM | 224 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.2 seconds | 9.2 seconds | |
| Kia XCeed engine produces 20 HP less power than Mazda CX-30, but torque is 29 NM more than Mazda CX-30. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | no data | 5.6 | |
| Fuel tank capacity: | 50 litres | 48 litres | |
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 300'000 km | 350'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Mazda CX-30 engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 6 years | 7 years | |
| Engine spread: | Used only for this car | Used also on Mazda 3 | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Mazda CX-30 might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.40 m | 4.40 m | |
| Width: | 1.83 m | 1.80 m | |
| Height: | 1.48 m | 1.56 m | |
| Kia XCeed and Mazda CX-30 are practically the same length. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 426 litres | 430 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
1378 litres | 1406 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 10.6 meters | 11.4 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Kia XCeed is 0.8 metres less than that of the Mazda CX-30, which means Kia XCeed can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight: | 1`870 kg | 2`070 kg | |
| Net weight: | 1`325 kg | 1`471 kg | |
| Load capacity: | 545 kg | 599 kg | |
| Kia XCeed load capacity (permitted cargo and passenger weight) is par apmēram 10 procentiem less than Mazda CX-30. Therefore, Mazda CX-30 is more suitable for longer family trips or transporting heavier loads. | |||
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 21 000 | 21 200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Kia XCeed has
|
Mazda CX-30 has
| |