Kia XCeed 2019 vs Mazda CX-30 2019
Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 1.6 Diesel | 1.8 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 115 HP | 116 HP | |
Torque: | 280 NM | 270 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11 seconds | 10.8 seconds | |
Mazda CX-30 is a more dynamic driving. Kia XCeed engine produces 1 HP less power than Mazda CX-30, but torque is 10 NM more than Mazda CX-30. Due to the lower power, Kia XCeed reaches 100 km/h speed 0.2 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.1 | 4.4 | |
The Kia XCeed is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Kia XCeed consumes 0.3 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mazda CX-30, which means that by driving the Kia XCeed over 15,000 km in a year you can save 45 litres of fuel. | |||
Fuel tank capacity: | 50 litres | 51 litres | |
Full fuel tank distance: | 1210 km in combined cycle | 1150 km in combined cycle | |
1310 km on highway | 1240 km on highway | ||
Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.40 m | 4.40 m | |
Width: | 1.83 m | 1.80 m | |
Height: | 1.48 m | 1.56 m | |
Kia XCeed and Mazda CX-30 are practically the same length. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 426 litres | 430 litres | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1378 litres | 1406 litres | |
Kia XCeed has 4 litres less trunk space than the Mazda CX-30. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Mazda CX-30 (by 28 litres). | |||
Turning diameter: | 10.6 meters | 11.4 meters | |
The turning circle of the Kia XCeed is 0.8 metres less than that of the Mazda CX-30, which means Kia XCeed can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | 1`900 | 1`949 | |
Safety: | no data | no data | |
Quality: | no data | no data | |
Average price (€): | 21 200 | 23 400 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Kia XCeed has
|
| |