Kia XCeed 2019 vs Land Rover Range Rover Evoque 2015
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.6 Diesel | 2.0 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 136 HP | 150 HP | |
| Torque: | 320 NM | 380 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.1 seconds | 10 seconds | |
| Kia XCeed engine produces 14 HP less power than Land Rover Range Rover Evoque, whereas torque is 60 NM less than Land Rover Range Rover Evoque. Due to the lower power, Kia XCeed reaches 100 km/h speed 0.1 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.4 | 5.1 | |
|
The Kia XCeed is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Kia XCeed consumes 0.7 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Land Rover Range Rover Evoque, which means that by driving the Kia XCeed over 15,000 km in a year you can save 105 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 50 litres | 57 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1130 km in combined cycle | 1110 km in combined cycle | |
| 1130 km on highway | 1260 km on highway | ||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 350'000 km | 350'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 8 years | 10 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 5 other car models, including Kia Sportage, Kia Ceed, Hyundai Tucson, Hyundai i30, Kia Optima | Installed on at least 6 other car models, including Jaguar XF, Land Rover Discovery Sport, Jaguar XE | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Land Rover Range Rover Evoque might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Land Rover Range Rover Evoque 2015 2.0 engine: This engine is known for its relatively limited lifespan. In early production models, balance shaft bearings wore out quickly and started making noise. The chain-driven timing system, located on the flywheel ... More about Land Rover Range Rover Evoque 2015 2.0 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.40 m | 4.37 m | |
| Width: | 1.83 m | 1.99 m | |
| Height: | 1.48 m | 1.66 m | |
| Kia XCeed is 2 cm longer than the Land Rover Range Rover Evoque, 16 cm narrower, while the height of Kia XCeed is 18 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 380 litres | 575 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1332 litres | no data | |
|
Land Rover Range Rover Evoque has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, Kia XCeed has 195 litres less trunk space than the Land Rover Range Rover Evoque. This could mean that the Kia XCeed uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.6 meters | 11.3 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Kia XCeed is 0.7 metres less than that of the Land Rover Range Rover Evoque, which means Kia XCeed can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`950 | 2`350 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 21 200 | 22 200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Kia XCeed has
|
Land Rover Range Rover Evoque has
| |