Kia XCeed 2019 vs Mazda CX-30 2019
Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 1.6 Hybrid | 1.8 Diesel | |
Hybrid engines (Kia XCeed) excel in urban environments with superior fuel efficiency and lower emissions during stop-and-go driving. Diesel engines (Mazda CX-30), however, are more fuel-efficient on long highway trips and provide greater torque for towing and heavy loads. | |||
Performance | |||
Power: | 61 HP | 116 HP | |
Torque: | 147 NM | 270 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11 seconds | 12.6 seconds | |
Kia XCeed engine produces 55 HP less power than Mazda CX-30, whereas torque is 123 NM less than Mazda CX-30. Despite less power, Kia XCeed reaches 100 km/h speed 1.6 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | no data | 5.0 | |
Fuel tank capacity: | 37 litres | 51 litres | |
Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.40 m | 4.40 m | |
Width: | 1.83 m | 1.80 m | |
Height: | 1.48 m | 1.56 m | |
Kia XCeed and Mazda CX-30 are practically the same length. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 291 litres | 430 litres | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1243 litres | 1406 litres | |
Mazda CX-30 has more luggage space. Kia XCeed has 139 litres less trunk space than the Mazda CX-30. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Mazda CX-30 (by 163 litres). | |||
Turning diameter: | 10.6 meters | 11.4 meters | |
The turning circle of the Kia XCeed is 0.8 metres less than that of the Mazda CX-30, which means Kia XCeed can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | 2`030 | 1`969 | |
Safety: | no data | no data | |
Quality: | no data | no data | |
Average price (€): | 21 200 | 22 400 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Kia XCeed has
|
Mazda CX-30 has
| |