Kia XCeed 2019 vs Mazda CX-30 2019
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.6 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 200 HP | 180 HP | |
| Torque: | 265 NM | 224 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 7.5 seconds | 9.2 seconds | |
|
Kia XCeed is more dynamic to drive. Kia XCeed engine produces 20 HP more power than Mazda CX-30, whereas torque is 41 NM more than Mazda CX-30. Thanks to more power Kia XCeed reaches 100 km/h speed 1.7 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.1 | 5.6 | |
|
The Mazda CX-30 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Kia XCeed consumes 1.5 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mazda CX-30, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Kia XCeed could require 225 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 50 litres | 48 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 700 km in combined cycle | 850 km in combined cycle | |
| 860 km on highway | 940 km on highway | ||
| Mazda CX-30 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 250'000 km | 350'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Mazda CX-30 engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 13 years | 5 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 9 other car models, including Kia Sportage, Kia Ceed, Hyundai Sonata, Hyundai Tucson, Hyundai Elantra | Used also on Mazda 3 | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Kia XCeed might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Hydraulic tappets: | no | yes | |
| The Mazda CX-30 engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.40 m | 4.40 m | |
| Width: | 1.83 m | 1.80 m | |
| Height: | 1.50 m | 1.56 m | |
| Kia XCeed and Mazda CX-30 are practically the same length. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 426 litres | 430 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1406 litres | |
| Kia XCeed has 4 litres less trunk space than the Mazda CX-30. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.6 meters | 11.4 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Kia XCeed is 0.8 metres less than that of the Mazda CX-30, which means Kia XCeed can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`880 | 2`070 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 21 600 | 22 200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Kia XCeed has
|
Mazda CX-30 has
| |